NDAA compliant US drone producers petition congress

Skyfish M4

Is the Blue sUAS record really hurting the home drone trade?  These producers say it’s – and are asking Congress to handle the issue.

Disclosure: DRONELIFE has a consumer relationship with drone producer Skyfish.  This text is just not a sponsored publish: DRONELIFE obtained no cost for publication.

NDAA compliant US drone producers say that the Normal Companies Administration (GSA) adoption of the Blue sUAS record as standards for buy is killing their companies – and innovation within the US drone trade.

Two US drone producers – Terraview  and Skyfish – petitioned Congress final week to take away the Blue sUAS requirement from GSA procurement techniques (see full textual content of letters under.)  The producers declare that the usage of the Blue sUAS record as an assurance of a safe platform has gone far past the meant objective – and is inflicting materials injury to NDAA compliant US drone producers.

NDAA Compliant US Drone Producers vs. the Blue sUAS Listing

Part 848 of the FY20 Nationwide Defence Authorization Act, titled “Prohibition on operation or procurement of foreign-made unmanned plane techniques,” together with Govt Order 13981, “Defending the US from Sure Unmanned Plane Programs,” laid out the U.S. authorities’s framework for prohibiting the use and procurement of foreign-made drone know-how for U.S. authorities companies, and outlined the precise necessities for compliance with safety measures, known as NDAA compliance.

Many US producers invested closely in NDAA compliance: however within the meantime, authorities companies together with the GSA merely adopted the Blue sUAS record, relatively than consider every applicant towards the NDAA standards.

The Blue sUAS record was initially revealed in August of 2020, and the unique Blue sUAS record was comprised of 5 particular drone platforms that had been developed in collaboration with the Protection Innovation Unit (DIU) to supply short-range reconnaissance on vetted platforms for U.S. protection.  The second Blue sUAS record – or the “Blue sUAS 2.0” – named 11 distributors, and was designed partially to determine a course of by which different producers could also be added.  The method of building a framework to open the record is shifting slowly, nevertheless – and within the meantime, say US producers not included on the record, the home drone trade is being stifled.

Each Terraview and Skyfish utilized for inclusion on the Blue sUAS 2.0 record, however have been informed that the DIU lacked the funding and sources to guage their platforms: an issue exacerbated by their efforts to adjust to NDAA necessities and manufacture their very own elements solely within the U.S., relatively than sourcing prepared made parts from abroad.

“We’re constructing all the pieces from scratch within the US, we’re not simply an integrator,” says Orest Pilskalns, CEO of Skyfish.  “There isn’t a reward for constructing one thing solely in the US – in reality as a result of it’s extra work to guage these items, being ‘too American made’ is a draw back.”

“The Blue sUAS record was by no means designed to be a gate-keeper for federal authorities procurement,” says Bruce Myers, Terraview CEO.  “It’s really stifling competitors… The DIU by no means meant the Blue sUAS record to be the be all finish all. ”

Michael Kelly, Terraview’s VP of World Gross sales, says the choice may be very clear: “The GSA and different federal companies ought to be counting on compliance with Govt Order 13981 and the language within the Protection Authorization Act – the chief order outlines precisely what’s required.”

“The actual aim was to keep away from potential safety points, and to keep away from doing enterprise with blacklisted firms.  We and different US-based manufactures greater than meet these necessities,” says Kelly.

Pilskalns agrees. “Utilizing the Blue sUAS record as a standards is doing precisely the alternative of what the NDAA was designed to do – it’s crushing innovation within the U.S. drone trade,” he says. “FY20 NDAA is the regulation, handed by Congress, and the federal authorities ought to observe that regulation.  The Blue sUAS record and the NDAA are two various things.”

Unintended Penalties

For the reason that GSA adopted the Blue sUAS record as a standards for inclusion, enterprise for these firms not included on the record has turn out to be far tougher.  Whereas the GSA maintains that these firms not on the record can nonetheless entry authorities prospects, Myers says that the workaround isn’t an inexpensive resolution to the issue.

“The workaround is that an company can concern a full RFP, which provides time and prices to the procurement course of.  That’s making it more durable on authorities purchasers in addition to stifling competitors,” says Myers.  “Many firms don’t perceive federal authorities contracting.  It’s not straightforward – you want a contract automobile.”

The GSA’s adoption of the Blue sUAS record has had an impact on greater than federal buying.  State and native governments, usually with out the knowledgeable sources to guage sUAS platforms, have additionally begun to undertake the record as an expedient to insuring safe know-how.

John Livingston, Skyfish Chairman, says that exlusion from the Blue sUAS record is a critical detriment to progress.   “That is crushing the home drone trade – for those who aren’t on the record you may’t compete for presidency or state enterprise.  It has an unlimited influence,” says Livingston.

“Moreover, this can be a killer for financing.  What Blue sUAS has finished is to indicate a “seal of approval”.  And with out it, it’s exhausting to get capital,” he says.  “It’s a really painful factor to not be included on this record as a US drone producer – it places you out within the chilly.”

“We admire what the DIU is doing, it’s an necessary perform.  However it’s gone far past that – this record has been pushed and promoted properly past what it was meant for.  This has had precisely the alternative impact from what everybody needed: to encourage innovation within the U.S. drone trade.”

“The federal authorities wants to permit the market to work freely, and innovation to happen,” agrees Myers.  “That’s how the US will catch up on this house.”

See textual content of letters to Congress, written by TerraView and Skyfish under:

Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, an expert drone companies market, and a fascinated observer of the rising drone trade and the regulatory setting for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles centered on the business drone house and is a global speaker and acknowledged determine within the trade.  Miriam has a level from the College of Chicago and over 20 years of expertise in excessive tech gross sales and advertising for brand spanking new applied sciences.
For drone trade consulting or writing, E-mail Miriam.

TWITTER:@spaldingbarker

Subscribe to DroneLife right here.